Anyone who still doubts that Obama is promoting Islam should carefully study his latest policy proposal which will allow millions of Syrian's to enter our country. As we know, Syria is the base of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). Their goal is to destroy civilization as we know it and declare a worldwide caliphate. Now this may seem like an unrealistic ambition for the treacherous organization but Obama's policies are facilitating them in their endeavor which causes me great concern.
Obama has been very clear that he will not wage war against the Islamic extremists. He does make it clear, however, that he will counter "extremism" with force if necessary. I have a very hard time with this because what exactly does he mean? An extremist has to have something to be extreme about. What, then, is Obama referring to when he cites extremism? Could it be Christian extremism, Jewish extremism or American extremism? It certainly isn't Islamic extremism.
A vast majority of Syrian's are Muslims. Sunni Islam sets the religious tone for Syria and provides the country's basic values. I don't believe that most Syrian's are members of ISIS. But ISIS has contaminated and saturated Syria such that it has formed a nation of peoples infiltrated with the brutal murderers. ISIS members, no doubt, have an influence and an affect on the people they co-habitate with. ISIS members proclaim to embrace Islam and interpret the Koran in the strictest sense. Their motivation for slaughtering people is to rid the world of the "infidels", those who do not follow the tenets of their faith. They rule by fear and intimidation.
We have seen how many American citizens as well as citizens from other allied nations have been radicalized and converted to the faith which ISIS follows. These are people who live in the free world and are afforded all of the opportunities such nations provide. Just imagine how many more Syrian people are being radicalized when living with and among the butchers'.
The U.S. claims that it will have a very strict vetting process which will supposedly eliminate the possibility of ISIS fighters entering our country. Let's assume for an instance that this were true. While this may prevent current ISIS fighters from entering our country it would not prevent people who have been indoctrinated and radicalized from entering. ISIS sympathizers could begin streaming across our borders with our consent. That's like letting the fox in the henhouse. It's reckless and it is inviting tragedy.
Once sympathizers, or those inclined to become sympathizers, take residency here they will provide a network of safe havens for the fighters who will slip across our borders. They will blend like they do in the middle east and identifying them will be increasingly difficult. This is what ISIS wants more than anything, to wreak havoc on U.S. soil.
In the long term we have to look at the demographic concerns. The millions of refugees who will be allowed to inhabit our country will be birthing children. These children will be brought up as Muslims. Now, over time, our country could transform from a largely Christian population to an Islamic population. Is that what we really want? I don't think so.
I'm all for humanitarian efforts to aid the refugees. A better plan would be to work with the dozens of middle eastern partners Obama claims to have garnered support from and provide assistance for these countries to house the refugees. By doing this we eliminate the threat of allowing Islamic terrorists onto our soil and we keep the refugees in their indigenous region.
We must voice our opposition to Obama's proposal by contacting our senators and representatives. Please do not delay. Once this policy is put into practice it could just be the beginning of the end of life as we know it and our children will be the ones to suffer most.
No comments:
Post a Comment